Talk:Gladiator
From Guild Wars Wiki
Contents |
[edit] Rank 9
http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/showthread.php?t=10120992&page=17 --The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:193.67.21.67 .
[edit] Rank 10
Has been added already, here's proof: http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/showthread.php?t=10182731 (84.104.182.16 10:09, 3 August 2007 (UTC))
[edit] WTF??
How come you need 500 points for first rank?? isn't that a bit much? Teo 22:40, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- There was a proposal going around to change the way people progress in the gladiator title. Go to this discussion page if you want more info. By the looks of things, they went with proposal one. I don't know if title progression works that way though, I'm still downloading the update. :S (Terra Xin 22:50, 23 August 2007 (UTC))
[edit] Table makes no sense
I suggest we leave the table as it was before the August 23 update and make a note that the update scaled up the points required to gain the title. As it is currently, the table makes no sense.--Stormrunner 00:22, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed, but if the proposal goes into full effect, we will need to update it.--Insane Maestro 16:07, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Emote Proposals
Rough Draft
1- Crocodile
3- Bear
6- "something"
12- Rodgort
OR
3- Crocodile
6- Bear
9- Hydra
12- Rodgort (or Trogdor =D)
Blackie ewilson92 15:59, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- If that was implemented, it would be great! Unfortunately i doubt ANet would implement this. Shame :( - Kiji 22:01, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- It will happen =D
Blackie ewilson92 23:00, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- It may happen. --Mme. Donelle 04:11, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- It will happen =D
Gladiator Title Emotes would be awesome, the last one could be Balthazar or Rurik or something like that
- We have already seen a Balthazar and Rurik in the game. I kinda hope for something new.
Blackie ewilson92 17:21, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
How about the guy from 300? -Duet 20:07, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
- no the last one must be chuck norris --Cursed Angel
02:21, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- How about Turai Ossa? ^_^ 72.84.243.137 20:29, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- Whoops, keep forgetting to sign in. (I wrote that comment yesterday) Sora267 17:54, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- How about Turai Ossa? ^_^ 72.84.243.137 20:29, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Gladiator emotes ? Very stupid idea... Tiberium 15:58, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- 10 times better than zaishen rank emotes tho. - Wuhy
01:10, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
[edit] rx?
Many people at HA, only let others that has a certain r(better know as RANK=Gladiator Rank)to participate, no offense but thats bull. The function of a build doesn't change no matter what's the user, only if the user knows how to use it. "r4+", wtf? Why would some people need that?--ShadowFog 16:31, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- Normally in HA they'll be talking about hero rank, not gladiator rank when asking for r4+ etc. Many teams will take gladiator ranks but they tend to be valued higher. rank 3 gladiator is often taken for entry into a rank 5 or 6 hero HA team. As to why they do it, its because they feel it gives them a better chance of winning, there are numerous flame-threads on the forums as to whether they're right or not. Sadie2k 06:34, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
PublicHero The Gladiator title, like the hero title is imo to high capped, i think we should have a better chance in maxing these titles instead of having the high end geeks bumming HA and TA at every chance they get to a title worth the same as any other title. Luxon & Kurzick titles are now insanely easy to max out in comparison, i think the gladiator and hero titles should be atleast smaller capped.PublicHero
- Fail less in the game pvers. Those titles r fine as they are and learn2play if they're too hard for you. 91.152.187.195 03:32, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- agreed. plz stop the QQ'ing silly stupid PvE nublets. /siiiiigh --Uchiha Lena 12:14, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- Uh... Gladiator is a PvP title. Wrong page you guys.--ShadowFog 03:00, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- personally i don't like that either. it makes it hard for people with a lower rank (r2 and down) to get a team. but that also has something to do with the fact you can't show your title until r3. personally i'm only r1 with 41 fame and thats from doing HA with guildies and friends. the tough part is when you don't have enough ppl and have to pug the rest, those ppl expect a ranked team. if everyone isnt r3 they leave. Daeheru 19:23, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- well, this would only be good if ppl from ra would have a chance in ta, or you could advance further than 10 wins(generally), so you could actually gain points like 4 in order.. or you could gain points by achieving something within the arena(3 successful interrupts in order, win under 1:30 mins(not counting resign or an enemy leaving), or things like that, but of course well thought out and tested), atm its a grindfest which proves lena's(as always) and the ip's point wrong since grindfests are bad, especially if you need to do so in order to enter some good(or at least high ranked) group. - Wuhy
01:22, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
- well, this would only be good if ppl from ra would have a chance in ta, or you could advance further than 10 wins(generally), so you could actually gain points like 4 in order.. or you could gain points by achieving something within the arena(3 successful interrupts in order, win under 1:30 mins(not counting resign or an enemy leaving), or things like that, but of course well thought out and tested), atm its a grindfest which proves lena's(as always) and the ip's point wrong since grindfests are bad, especially if you need to do so in order to enter some good(or at least high ranked) group. - Wuhy
- personally i don't like that either. it makes it hard for people with a lower rank (r2 and down) to get a team. but that also has something to do with the fact you can't show your title until r3. personally i'm only r1 with 41 fame and thats from doing HA with guildies and friends. the tough part is when you don't have enough ppl and have to pug the rest, those ppl expect a ranked team. if everyone isnt r3 they leave. Daeheru 19:23, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- Uh... Gladiator is a PvP title. Wrong page you guys.--ShadowFog 03:00, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- agreed. plz stop the QQ'ing silly stupid PvE nublets. /siiiiigh --Uchiha Lena 12:14, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
[edit] bug
i made 10 wins on RA but the glad bar remained at the same number. --The preceding unsigned comment was added by 79.103.39.179 (talk).
- Did you manage 10 wins consecutively? That is, 10 straight wins. If you did, then you're in need of support, not the wiki community. -- ab.er.rant
15:19, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Math moved.
Moved the math to max this title to the "trivia" section since it seems more of a "trivial" question than "aquisition". --Uchiha Lena 20:37, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Glad emote?
I always thought /rank was the emote for the glad track, but was told that is for the hero track. Is there an emote, and if so, what is it? About to hit r3 and only want it for the emote lol 209.33.14.48 16:34, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- what you are thinking about is the Zaishen rank--splatterpuss 16:01, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- If your about to hit r3 glad, then you wouldn't ask such a stupid question... Tiberium 16:03, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- There's nothing wrong with asking that question at all--splatterpuss 16:05, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- If your about to hit r3 glad, then you wouldn't ask such a stupid question... Tiberium 16:03, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Apparently,
Gladiator rank affects gold drops. Like 1% chance of better drops for every rank. or according to some kid in my guild, who claims to be friends with a game designer. He's tryin to convince me to synch RA with him this weekend. Oh, and I don't believe him, if you think I'm being serious about that. personn5
01:16, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
[edit] YAY for update
Now that TA has been removed, it's finally possible to get more points in RA, not just 3 in 1 run and then getting killed by some lame rtl or shove spike etc. /roar Drake Slasher 14:31, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
[edit] after 25 cons
There's extra 5 glad points before you are sent back to outpost, so you gain 19 points for 25 cons now! --Abbc 19:59, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- I got 24 and got kicked out bcoz somebody else in the group got 25 and that means we missed out on 4+5....--Silven 06:12, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

