Talk:Daeman

From Guild Wars Wiki

[edit] Evaluation

I think that consensus should be reached on the evaluation section prior to any further subjective opinions being posted. What one person sees as a pro, another is labeling as garbage. I do not wish this to turn into a revert war, since it appears to be happening on several of the henchmen pages since the update. -- Wyn talk 12:29, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Cons

Troll unguent is bad as the hench wastes 3 seconds + aftercast when a monk is likely to heal them during that time. --Qwertyasdf 02:56, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

But it has a relatively long lasting regeneration. It's the catch-all ranger heal.-- anguard 02:58, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

It's the catch-all ranger heal for rangers who split and gank npcs in PvP. It is a complete waste of bar space, cast time and energy cost in PvE, where he is incapable of splitting (because he's AI) so he will be near monks the entire time. -Auron 03:00, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

So can I change all hench ranger pages back to saying that troll unguent sucks? I have not seen any concrete argument that suggests otherwise. That goes for all self heals too with Lion's Comfort maybe being a bit more debatable.

Works for me tbh. Most of the old hench bars could be described with a huge list of cons and no pros, as they were mostly all bad. -Auron 18:29, 2 November 2009 (UTC)